PairBook
HomeFLC › FLC vs PDI

FLC vs PDI: Correlation

Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.71.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.71
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.59
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.60
long-run
Ann. covariance
115.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FLC and PDI?

Over the past 3 years, FLC and PDI moved with a correlation of 0.71, which is strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.59) runs below the 3-year figure (0.71). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.60, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 115.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, PDI places #6 of the 22 assets tracked against FLC. Over the last 12 months FLC came out ahead by 11.4 percentage points (+3.8% against -7.6%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FLC vs PDI: side by side

FLC (Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc)PDI (PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund)
1-year return+3.8%-7.6%
5-year return-0.2%+11.0%
Volatility (ann.)11.3%14.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.480.52
Max drawdown (3Y)-10.5%-14.4%
Market cap$0.2B$7.1B
P/E (trailing)9.37.5
Dividend yield7.25%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: PDI 7.5 vs 9.3Higher yield: FLC 7.25% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FLC -10.5% vs -14.4%Higher 5y return: PDI +11.0% vs -0.2%
-12%0%+7%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FLC · PDI

Year-by-year returns

YearFLCPDI
2022-25.1%-17.0%
2023-0.8%+12.0%
2024+23.1%+17.2%
2025+12.4%+11.1%
2026-0.4%-3.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FLC and PDI good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.71 means FLC and PDI share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FLC and PDI?

The FLC/PDI correlation stands at 0.71 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.59, 5 years: 0.60), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PDI a good diversifier for FLC?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.71 means FLC and PDI share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.71 mean?

A reading of 0.71 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/flc-vs-pdi.json

FLC vs PDI: 3-year weekly correlation 0.71FLC vs PDI0.71

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FLC vs PDI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/flc-vs-pdi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/flc-vs-pdi/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FLC correlations · PDI correlations