PairBook
HomeFLC › FLC vs HGLB

FLC vs HGLB: Correlation

How closely do Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) and Highland Global Allocation Fund (HGLB) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.63, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.63
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.54
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.47
long-run
Ann. covariance
184.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FLC and HGLB?

Over the past 3 years, FLC and HGLB moved with a correlation of 0.63, which is strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.54 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.47, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 184.9 %².

Within FLC's tracked universe of 22 assets, HGLB comes in at #11 by 3-year correlation. Their 12-month results are close: +3.8% for FLC against +1.0% for HGLB. One caveat on sizing: HGLB is 2.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FLC vs HGLB: side by side

FLC (Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc)HGLB (Highland Global Allocation Fund)
1-year return+3.8%+1.0%
5-year return-0.2%+36.3%
Volatility (ann.)11.3%26.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.480.91
Max drawdown (3Y)-10.5%-24.1%
Market cap$0.2B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)9.318.9
Dividend yield7.25%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: FLC 9.3 vs 18.9Higher yield: FLC 7.25% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FLC -10.5% vs -24.1%Higher 5y return: HGLB +36.3% vs -0.2%
-7%0%+18%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FLC · HGLB

Year-by-year returns

YearFLCHGLB
2022-25.1%+14.5%
2023-0.8%-6.1%
2024+23.1%-1.5%
2025+12.4%+51.7%
2026-0.4%-10.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FLC and HGLB good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.63 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FLC and HGLB?

The FLC/HGLB correlation stands at 0.63 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.54, 5 years: 0.47), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is HGLB a good diversifier for FLC?

To a limited degree. At 0.63 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.63 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/flc-vs-hglb.json

FLC vs HGLB: 3-year weekly correlation 0.63FLC vs HGLB0.63

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FLC vs HGLB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/flc-vs-hglb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/flc-vs-hglb/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FLC correlations · HGLB correlations