PairBook
HomeFKWL › FKWL vs GUT

FKWL vs GUT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Franklin Wireless Corp. (FKWL) and Gabelli Utility Trust (The) (GUT) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-162.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FKWL and GUT?

On 3 years of weekly data the FKWL/GUT correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.12) than the 3-year average (-0.22). The 5-year figure is -0.10, and annualized covariance runs at -162.2 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against FKWL, GUT sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #8. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GUT outperformed by 59.9 percentage points (-41.4% for FKWL against +18.5% for GUT). Risk is not evenly split, since FKWL carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FKWL vs GUT: side by side

FKWL (Franklin Wireless Corp.)GUT (Gabelli Utility Trust (The))
1-year return-41.4%+18.5%
5-year return-69.6%+29.5%
Volatility (ann.)33.9%21.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.020.37
Max drawdown (3Y)-67.3%-28.7%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)11.9
Dividend yield0.00%9.39%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: GUT 9.39% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: GUT -28.7% vs -67.3%Higher 5y return: GUT +29.5% vs -69.6%
-44%0%+26%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FKWL · GUT

Year-by-year returns

YearFKWLGUT
2022+2.1%-1.1%
2023-24.0%-21.1%
2024+44.5%+6.0%
2025-10.1%+33.1%
2026-43.7%+13.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FKWL and GUT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FKWL and GUT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FKWL and GUT is -0.22 over 3 years, 0.12 over 1 year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is GUT a good diversifier for FKWL?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fkwl-vs-gut.json

FKWL vs GUT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22FKWL vs GUT-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FKWL vs GUT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fkwl-vs-gut.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fkwl-vs-gut/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FKWL correlations · GUT correlations