PairBook
HomeFITB › FITB vs ZCMD

FITB vs ZCMD: Correlation

How closely do Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and Zhongchao Inc. - Class A (ZCMD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.17, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.16
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-711.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FITB and ZCMD?

On 3 years of weekly data the FITB/ZCMD correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.16 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -711.7 %².

Out of 45 assets tracked against FITB, ZCMD lands near the bottom at #41. The last year tells two different stories: FITB led by 124.5 percentage points, +24.6% for FITB against -99.9% for ZCMD. One caveat on sizing: ZCMD is 4.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FITB vs ZCMD: side by side

FITB (Fifth Third Bancorp)ZCMD (Zhongchao Inc. - Class A)
1-year return+24.6%-99.9%
5-year return+71.2%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)29.4%141.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.030.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.9%-100.0%
Market cap$49.7B
P/E (trailing)18.5
Dividend yield2.90%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: FITB 2.90% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FITB -29.9% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: FITB +71.2% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FITB · ZCMD

Year-by-year returns

YearFITBZCMD
2022-21.9%-35.4%
2023+10.4%-69.5%
2024+27.2%-53.8%
2025+14.8%-72.2%
2026+19.1%-99.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FITB and ZCMD good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FITB and ZCMD?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FITB and ZCMD is -0.17 over 3 years, -0.16 over 1 year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is ZCMD a good diversifier for FITB?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fitb-vs-zcmd.json

FITB vs ZCMD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17FITB vs ZCMD-0.17

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FITB vs ZCMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fitb-vs-zcmd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fitb-vs-zcmd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FITB correlations · ZCMD correlations