PairBook
HomeFITB › FITB vs NCLH

FITB vs NCLH: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) carry a correlation of 0.57, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.57
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.54
long-run
Ann. covariance
840.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FITB and NCLH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FITB and NCLH correlate at 0.57, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.46) runs below the 3-year figure (0.57). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.54, with an annualized covariance of 840.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, NCLH places #27 of the 45 assets tracked against FITB. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FITB ahead by 57.7 points (+24.6% versus -33.1%). The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.40 and 0.76 over the past three years, a moderate range. One caveat on sizing: NCLH is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FITB vs NCLH: side by side

FITB (Fifth Third Bancorp)NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings)
1-year return+24.6%-33.1%
5-year return+71.2%-34.4%
Volatility (ann.)29.4%49.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.031.52
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.9%-49.1%
Market cap$49.7B$7.6B
P/E (trailing)18.510.1
Dividend yield2.90%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsConsumer Discretionary
Lower P/E: NCLH 10.1 vs 18.5Higher yield: FITB 2.90% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FITB -29.9% vs -49.1%Higher 5y return: FITB +71.2% vs -34.4%
-40%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FITB · NCLH

Year-by-year returns

YearFITBNCLH
2022-21.9%-41.0%
2023+10.4%+63.7%
2024+27.2%+28.4%
2025+14.8%-13.3%
2026+19.1%-25.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FITB and NCLH good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.57 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FITB and NCLH?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FITB and NCLH is 0.57 over 3 years, 0.46 over 1 year and 0.54 over 5 years.

Is NCLH a good diversifier for FITB?

To a limited degree. At 0.57 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.57 mean?

A reading of 0.57 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fitb-vs-nclh.json

FITB vs NCLH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.57FITB vs NCLH0.57

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FITB vs NCLH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fitb-vs-nclh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fitb-vs-nclh/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FITB correlations · NCLH correlations