PairBook
HomeFITB › FITB vs LICN

FITB vs LICN: Correlation

How closely do Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and Lichen International Limited - Class A (LICN) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.17, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.06
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-41498.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FITB and LICN?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FITB and LICN correlate at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.06 versus -0.17 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -41498.4 %².

Within FITB's tracked universe of 45 assets, LICN comes in at #40 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: FITB led by 99.3 percentage points, +24.6% for FITB against -74.7% for LICN. Risk is not evenly split, since LICN carries 290.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FITB vs LICN: side by side

FITB (Fifth Third Bancorp)LICN (Lichen International Limited - Class A)
1-year return+24.6%-74.7%
5-year return+71.2%n/a
Volatility (ann.)29.4%8528.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.03-80.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.9%-98.4%
Market cap$49.7B
P/E (trailing)18.5
Dividend yield2.90%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: FITB 2.90% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FITB -29.9% vs -98.4%
-81%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FITB · LICN

Year-by-year returns

YearFITBLICN
2022-21.9%
2023+10.4%
2024+27.2%-91.0%
2025+14.8%+1484.3%
2026+19.1%-56.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FITB and LICN good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, FITB and LICN have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FITB and LICN?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.17 over 3 years, with -0.06 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is LICN a good diversifier for FITB?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, FITB and LICN have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fitb-vs-licn.json

FITB vs LICN: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17FITB vs LICN-0.17

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FITB vs LICN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fitb-vs-licn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fitb-vs-licn/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FITB correlations · LICN correlations