PairBook
HomeFISV › FISV vs PAM

FISV vs PAM: Correlation

Fiserv (FISV) and Pampa Energia S.A. (PAM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.32.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.66
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-575.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FISV and PAM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FISV and PAM correlate at -0.32, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.66) than the 3-year average (-0.32). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.13, with an annualized covariance of -575.1 %².

PAM is close to the least connected end of FISV's tracked universe, ranking #36 of 39. The last year tells two different stories: PAM led by 84.3 percentage points, -61.9% for FISV against +22.4% for PAM.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FISV vs PAM: side by side

FISV (Fiserv)PAM (Pampa Energia S.A.)
1-year return-61.9%+22.4%
5-year return-55.0%+339.3%
Volatility (ann.)39.2%45.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.580.38
Max drawdown (3Y)-80.2%-40.4%
Market cap$28.0B$4.3B
P/E (trailing)10.17.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: PAM 7.3 vs 10.1Smaller drawdown: PAM -40.4% vs -80.2%Higher 5y return: PAM +339.3% vs -55.0%
-65%0%+33%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FISV · PAM

Year-by-year returns

YearFISVPAM
2022-2.6%+51.3%
2023+31.4%+55.0%
2024+54.6%+77.6%
2025-67.3%+0.6%
2026-21.7%-8.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FISV and PAM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FISV and PAM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FISV and PAM is -0.32 over 3 years, -0.66 over 1 year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is PAM a good diversifier for FISV?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.32 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fisv-vs-pam.json

FISV vs PAM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32FISV vs PAM-0.32

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FISV vs PAM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fisv-vs-pam.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fisv-vs-pam/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FISV correlations · PAM correlations