PairBook
HomeFIS › FIS vs QTWO

FIS vs QTWO: Correlation

How closely do Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) and Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.46, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.46
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.57
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.52
long-run
Ann. covariance
526.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FIS and QTWO?

On 3 years of weekly data the FIS/QTWO correlation comes out at 0.46, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.57) runs above the 3-year figure (0.46). The 5-year figure is 0.52, and annualized covariance runs at 526.4 %².

By 3-year correlation, QTWO places #16 of the 33 assets tracked against FIS. The last year tells two different stories: QTWO led by 24.0 percentage points, -40.0% for FIS against -16.0% for QTWO. Risk is not evenly split, since QTWO carries 1.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FIS vs QTWO: side by side

FIS (Fidelity National Information Services)QTWO (Q2 Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return-40.0%-16.0%
5-year return-63.9%-24.7%
Volatility (ann.)27.2%41.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.571.41
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.5%-62.0%
Market cap$20.9B$4.1B
P/E (trailing)6.245.9
Dividend yield4.13%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: FIS 6.2 vs 45.9Higher yield: FIS 4.13% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FIS -56.5% vs -62.0%Higher 5y return: QTWO -24.7% vs -63.9%
-46%0%+4%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FIS · QTWO

Year-by-year returns

YearFISQTWO
2022-36.5%-66.2%
2023-8.2%+61.6%
2024+37.0%+131.9%
2025-15.8%-28.3%
2026-37.8%-9.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FIS and QTWO good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.46, FIS and QTWO keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FIS and QTWO?

The FIS/QTWO correlation stands at 0.46 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.57, 5 years: 0.52), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is QTWO a good diversifier for FIS?

Reasonably. At 0.46, FIS and QTWO keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.46 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.46 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fis-vs-qtwo.json

FIS vs QTWO: 3-year weekly correlation 0.46FIS vs QTWO0.46

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FIS vs QTWO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fis-vs-qtwo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fis-vs-qtwo/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FIS correlations · QTWO correlations