PairBook
HomeFGNX › FGNX vs NAT

FGNX vs NAT: Correlation

FG Nexus Inc. (FGNX) and Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.03
long-run
Ann. covariance
-910.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FGNX and NAT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FGNX and NAT correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.29 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.03, with an annualized covariance of -910.6 %².

Among the 18 assets we track against FGNX, NAT sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #16. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months NAT outperformed by 225.1 percentage points (-87.5% for FGNX against +137.6% for NAT). Risk is not evenly split, since FGNX carries 2.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FGNX vs NAT: side by side

FGNX (FG Nexus Inc.)NAT (Nordic American Tankers Limited)
1-year return-87.5%+137.6%
5-year return-98.8%+351.2%
Volatility (ann.)105.1%36.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.070.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.9%-46.3%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)25.0
Dividend yield0.00%9.51%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: NAT 9.51% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: NAT -46.3% vs -97.9%Higher 5y return: NAT +351.2% vs -98.8%
-90%0%+129%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FGNX · NAT

Year-by-year returns

YearFGNXNAT
2022-24.2%+87.9%
2023-43.9%+55.8%
2024-45.5%-33.6%
2025-87.4%+44.6%
2026-42.8%+111.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FGNX and NAT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FGNX and NAT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.24 over 3 years, with -0.29 over the last year and -0.03 over 5 years.

Is NAT a good diversifier for FGNX?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fgnx-vs-nat.json

FGNX vs NAT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24FGNX vs NAT-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FGNX vs NAT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fgnx-vs-nat.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fgnx-vs-nat/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FGNX correlations · NAT correlations