PairBook
HomeFGBI › FGBI vs IPSC

FGBI vs IPSC: Correlation

How closely do First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (FGBI) and Century Therapeutics, Inc. (IPSC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.38, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.38
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.59
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.28
long-run
Ann. covariance
2226.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FGBI and IPSC?

On 3 years of weekly data the FGBI/IPSC correlation comes out at 0.38, moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.59 versus 0.38 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is 0.28, and annualized covariance runs at 2226.3 %².

Few assets follow FGBI as closely as IPSC, which ranks #2 of 11 tracked partners. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months IPSC outperformed by 330.3 percentage points (+2.7% for FGBI against +333.0% for IPSC). Note the risk asymmetry: IPSC runs 2.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FGBI vs IPSC: side by side

FGBI (First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.)IPSC (Century Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return+2.7%+333.0%
5-year return-46.6%-90.7%
Volatility (ann.)52.8%111.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.282.01
Max drawdown (3Y)-70.0%-92.7%
Market cap$0.1B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.49%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: FGBI 0.49% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FGBI -70.0% vs -92.7%Higher 5y return: FGBI -46.6% vs -90.7%
-48%0%+415%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FGBI · IPSC

Year-by-year returns

YearFGBIIPSC
2022+18.2%-67.7%
2023-50.2%-35.3%
2024+6.6%-69.6%
2025-52.5%-1.5%
2026+51.4%+124.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FGBI and IPSC good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.38, FGBI and IPSC keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FGBI and IPSC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.38 over 3 years, with 0.59 over the last year and 0.28 over 5 years.

Is IPSC a good diversifier for FGBI?

Reasonably. At 0.38, FGBI and IPSC keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.38 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.38 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fgbi-vs-ipsc.json

FGBI vs IPSC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.38FGBI vs IPSC0.38

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FGBI vs IPSC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fgbi-vs-ipsc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fgbi-vs-ipsc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FGBI correlations · IPSC correlations