PairBook
HomeFF › FF vs PULM

FF vs PULM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, FutureFuel Corp. (FF) and Pulmatrix, Inc. (PULM) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1789.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FF and PULM?

On 3 years of weekly data the FF/PULM correlation comes out at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.32 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.17, and annualized covariance runs at -1789.2 %².

Among the 12 assets we track against FF, PULM sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #12. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FF outperformed by 107.1 percentage points (+38.4% for FF against -68.7% for PULM). Note the risk asymmetry: PULM runs 3.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FF vs PULM: side by side

FF (FutureFuel Corp.)PULM (Pulmatrix, Inc.)
1-year return+38.4%-68.7%
5-year return+11.5%-90.6%
Volatility (ann.)48.8%144.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.88-0.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-47.9%-88.1%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield3.58%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: FF 3.58% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FF -47.9% vs -88.1%Higher 5y return: FF +11.5% vs -90.6%
-75%0%+46%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FF · PULM

Year-by-year returns

YearFFPULM
2022+9.9%-55.7%
2023-22.8%-52.1%
2024+31.0%+275.3%
2025-35.8%-68.1%
2026+65.4%-31.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FF and PULM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FF and PULM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FF and PULM is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.32 over 1 year and -0.17 over 5 years.

Is PULM a good diversifier for FF?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ff-vs-pulm.json

FF vs PULM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25FF vs PULM-0.25

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FF vs PULM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ff-vs-pulm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ff-vs-pulm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FF correlations · PULM correlations