PairBook
HomeFEMY › FEMY vs MUC

FEMY vs MUC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Femasys Inc. (FEMY) and Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. (MUC) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.01
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1527.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FEMY and MUC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FEMY and MUC correlate at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.01 versus -0.27 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.15, with an annualized covariance of -1527.6 %².

Among the 32 assets we track against FEMY, MUC ranks #24 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MUC ahead by 72.1 points (-61.2% versus +10.9%). Risk is not evenly split, since FEMY carries 46.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FEMY vs MUC: side by side

FEMY (Femasys Inc.)MUC (Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc.)
1-year return-61.2%+10.9%
5-year return-98.0%-13.2%
Volatility (ann.)509.3%10.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.490.25
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.2%-10.7%
Market cap$1.0B
P/E (trailing)46.3
Dividend yield0.00%6.04%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: MUC 6.04% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MUC -10.7% vs -97.2%Higher 5y return: MUC -13.2% vs -98.0%
-70%0%+177%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FEMY · MUC

Year-by-year returns

YearFEMYMUC
2022-76.9%-26.8%
2023+8.3%+7.9%
2024+12.8%+0.8%
2025-47.6%+6.0%
2026-75.8%+4.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FEMY and MUC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FEMY and MUC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FEMY and MUC is -0.27 over 3 years, 0.01 over 1 year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is MUC a good diversifier for FEMY?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/femy-vs-muc.json

FEMY vs MUC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27FEMY vs MUC-0.27

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FEMY vs MUC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/femy-vs-muc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/femy-vs-muc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FEMY correlations · MUC correlations