FDS vs VRSN: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, FactSet (FDS) and Verisign (VRSN) carry a correlation of 0.37, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FDS and VRSN?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FDS and VRSN correlate at 0.37, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.48) than the 3-year average (0.37). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.44, with an annualized covariance of 273.1 %².
Among the 32 assets we track against FDS, VRSN ranks #19 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VRSN ahead by 28.2 points (-18.6% versus +9.6%). On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.14 and 0.49, a moderate band.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FDS vs VRSN: side by side
| FDS (FactSet) | VRSN (Verisign) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -18.6% | +9.6% |
| 5-year return | -15.8% | +38.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 31.9% | 23.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.56 | 0.50 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -61.1% | -30.2% |
| Market cap | $10.8B | $26.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 19.5 | 31.9 |
| Dividend yield | 1.51% | 1.08% |
| Sector / category | Financials | Information Technology |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FDS | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -16.7% | -19.1% |
| 2023 | +20.0% | +0.3% |
| 2024 | +1.6% | +0.5% |
| 2025 | -38.9% | +18.4% |
| 2026 | +6.0% | +22.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FDS and VRSN good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.37, FDS and VRSN keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FDS and VRSN?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.37 over 3 years, with 0.48 over the last year and 0.44 over 5 years.
Is VRSN a good diversifier for FDS?
Reasonably. At 0.37, FDS and VRSN keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.37 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.37 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fds-vs-vrsn.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fds-vs-vrsn/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FDS correlations · VRSN correlations
