PairBook
HomeFDS › FDS vs TER

FDS vs TER: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, FactSet (FDS) and Teradyne (TER) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.01
long-run
Ann. covariance
-364.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FDS and TER?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FDS and TER correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.43 versus -0.22 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.01, with an annualized covariance of -364.9 %².

TER is close to the least connected end of FDS's tracked universe, ranking #29 of 32. The last year tells two different stories: TER led by 237.4 percentage points, -18.6% for FDS against +218.8% for TER. The relationship is regime-dependent: the rolling one-year correlation swung between -0.42 and 0.56 over the past three years, so this pair behaves very differently depending on the market environment. One caveat on sizing: TER is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FDS vs TER: side by side

FDS (FactSet)TER (Teradyne)
1-year return-18.6%+218.8%
5-year return-15.8%+207.9%
Volatility (ann.)31.9%52.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.561.70
Max drawdown (3Y)-61.1%-58.2%
Market cap$10.8B$58.2B
P/E (trailing)19.550.0
Dividend yield1.51%0.14%
Sector / categoryFinancialsInformation Technology
Lower P/E: FDS 19.5 vs 50.0Higher yield: FDS 1.51% vs 0.14%Smaller drawdown: TER -58.2% vs -61.1%Higher 5y return: TER +207.9% vs -15.8%
-47%0%+265%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FDS · TER

Year-by-year returns

YearFDSTER
2022-16.7%-46.3%
2023+20.0%+24.8%
2024+1.6%+16.5%
2025-38.9%+54.4%
2026+6.0%+92.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FDS and TER good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FDS and TER?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.43 over the last year and -0.01 over 5 years.

Is TER a good diversifier for FDS?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fds-vs-ter.json

FDS vs TER: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22FDS vs TER-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FDS vs TER correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fds-vs-ter.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fds-vs-ter/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FDS correlations · TER correlations