PairBook
HomeFDMT › FDMT vs SERV

FDMT vs SERV: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. (FDMT) and Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) carry a correlation of -0.24, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.05
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3811.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FDMT and SERV?

On 3 years of weekly data the FDMT/SERV correlation comes out at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.05) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.24). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -3811.1 %².

Among the 15 assets we track against FDMT, SERV sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #13. The last year tells two different stories: FDMT led by 188.8 percentage points, +130.8% for FDMT against -58.0% for SERV. Note the risk asymmetry: SERV runs 2.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FDMT vs SERV: side by side

FDMT (4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.)SERV (Serve Robotics Inc.)
1-year return+130.8%-58.0%
5-year return-50.9%n/a
Volatility (ann.)89.9%186.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.091.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.0%-92.4%
Market cap$0.8B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: SERV -92.4% vs -93.0%
-52%0%+118%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FDMT · SERV

Year-by-year returns

YearFDMTSERV
2022+1.2%
2023-8.8%
2024-72.5%
2025+34.6%-23.1%
2026+98.8%-53.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FDMT and SERV good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FDMT and SERV?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.24 over 3 years, with -0.05 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is SERV a good diversifier for FDMT?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fdmt-vs-serv.json

FDMT vs SERV: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24FDMT vs SERV-0.24

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FDMT vs SERV correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fdmt-vs-serv.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fdmt-vs-serv/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FDMT correlations · SERV correlations