PairBook
HomeFCEL › FCEL vs MCK

FCEL vs MCK: Correlation

FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) and McKesson Corporation (MCK) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-627.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FCEL and MCK?

Over the past 3 years, FCEL and MCK moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.25 over 1 year against -0.23 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.14, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -627.7 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against FCEL, MCK sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FCEL ahead by 312.3 points (+343.1% versus +30.8%). Note the risk asymmetry: FCEL runs 4.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FCEL vs MCK: side by side

FCEL (FuelCell Energy, Inc.)MCK (McKesson Corporation)
1-year return+343.1%+30.8%
5-year return-89.6%+354.8%
Volatility (ann.)109.1%25.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.170.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.0%-27.2%
Market cap$1.5B$103.8B
P/E (trailing)24.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.37%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Higher yield: MCK 0.37% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MCK -27.2% vs -93.0%Higher 5y return: MCK +354.8% vs -89.6%
0%+594%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FCEL · MCK

Year-by-year returns

YearFCELMCK
2022-46.5%+51.8%
2023-42.4%+24.1%
2024-81.2%+23.7%
2025-19.1%+44.5%
2026+164.3%+8.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FCEL and MCK good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FCEL and MCK?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FCEL and MCK is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.25 over 1 year and -0.14 over 5 years.

Is MCK a good diversifier for FCEL?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fcel-vs-mck.json

FCEL vs MCK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23FCEL vs MCK-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FCEL vs MCK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fcel-vs-mck.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fcel-vs-mck/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FCEL correlations · MCK correlations