PairBook
HomeFC › FC vs RDGT

FC vs RDGT: Correlation

Franklin Covey Company (FC) and Ridgetech, Inc. (RDGT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.19
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1770.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FC and RDGT?

Over the past 3 years, FC and RDGT moved with a correlation of -0.28, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.37 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.19, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1770.9 %².

Out of 15 assets tracked against FC, RDGT lands near the bottom at #13. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FC outperformed by 102.9 percentage points (+3.4% for FC against -99.5% for RDGT). One caveat on sizing: RDGT is 2.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FC vs RDGT: side by side

FC (Franklin Covey Company)RDGT (Ridgetech, Inc.)
1-year return+3.4%-99.5%
5-year return-52.7%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)52.1%120.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.110.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-74.0%-99.9%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)135.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: FC -74.0% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: FC -52.7% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+212%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FC · RDGT

Year-by-year returns

YearFCRDGT
2022+0.9%-21.5%
2023-6.9%-93.9%
2024-13.7%-59.8%
2025-55.3%+61.0%
2026+21.3%-99.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FC and RDGT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.28, FC and RDGT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FC and RDGT?

The FC/RDGT correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.37, 5 years: -0.19), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RDGT a good diversifier for FC?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.28, FC and RDGT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fc-vs-rdgt.json

FC vs RDGT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28FC vs RDGT-0.28

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FC vs RDGT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fc-vs-rdgt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fc-vs-rdgt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FC correlations · RDGT correlations