PairBook
HomeFBYD › FBYD vs VTRS

FBYD vs VTRS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. (FBYD) and Viatris (VTRS) carry a correlation of -0.16, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-742.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FBYD and VTRS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FBYD and VTRS correlate at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.28 versus -0.16 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -742.0 %².

Among the 13 assets we track against FBYD, VTRS ranks #8 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VTRS outperformed by 27.5 percentage points (+40.3% for FBYD against +67.8% for VTRS). Note the risk asymmetry: FBYD runs 4.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FBYD vs VTRS: side by side

FBYD (Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.)VTRS (Viatris)
1-year return+40.3%+67.8%
5-year returnn/a+44.6%
Volatility (ann.)137.7%32.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.370.79
Max drawdown (3Y)-81.2%-45.0%
Market cap$0.5B$19.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%2.85%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Higher yield: VTRS 2.85% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: VTRS -45.0% vs -81.2%
-34%0%+220%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FBYD · VTRS

Year-by-year returns

YearFBYDVTRS
2022-14.3%
2023+2.1%
2024-22.0%+19.7%
2025+87.8%+5.1%
2026-33.4%+38.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FBYD and VTRS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, FBYD and VTRS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FBYD and VTRS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.16 over 3 years, with -0.28 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is VTRS a good diversifier for FBYD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, FBYD and VTRS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.16 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fbyd-vs-vtrs.json

FBYD vs VTRS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16FBYD vs VTRS-0.16

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FBYD vs VTRS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fbyd-vs-vtrs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fbyd-vs-vtrs/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FBYD correlations · VTRS correlations