PairBook
HomeFBIN › FBIN vs SCI

FBIN vs SCI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) and Service Corporation International (SCI) carry a correlation of 0.47, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.47
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.43
long-run
Ann. covariance
429.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FBIN and SCI?

Over the past 3 years, FBIN and SCI moved with a correlation of 0.47, which is moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.47) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.43, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 429.3 %².

Within FBIN's tracked universe of 20 assets, SCI comes in at #15 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SCI outperformed by 28.6 percentage points (-22.1% for FBIN against +6.5% for SCI). Risk is not evenly split, since FBIN carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FBIN vs SCI: side by side

FBIN (Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.)SCI (Service Corporation International)
1-year return-22.1%+6.5%
5-year return-42.9%+44.7%
Volatility (ann.)38.8%23.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.290.47
Max drawdown (3Y)-61.9%-21.6%
Market cap$5.4B$11.4B
P/E (trailing)37.421.8
Dividend yield2.20%1.59%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: SCI 21.8 vs 37.4Higher yield: FBIN 2.20% vs 1.59%Smaller drawdown: SCI -21.6% vs -61.9%Higher 5y return: SCI +44.7% vs -42.9%
-43%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FBIN · SCI

Year-by-year returns

YearFBINSCI
2022-36.5%-1.0%
2023+35.2%+0.7%
2024-9.1%+18.4%
2025-25.4%-0.7%
2026-7.8%+8.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FBIN and SCI good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.47, FBIN and SCI keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FBIN and SCI?

The FBIN/SCI correlation stands at 0.47 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.47, 5 years: 0.43), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SCI a good diversifier for FBIN?

Reasonably. At 0.47, FBIN and SCI keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.47 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fbin-vs-sci.json

FBIN vs SCI: 3-year weekly correlation 0.47FBIN vs SCI0.47

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FBIN vs SCI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fbin-vs-sci.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fbin-vs-sci/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FBIN correlations · SCI correlations