PairBook
HomeFATE › FATE vs RVP

FATE vs RVP: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE) and Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP) carry a correlation of 0.34, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.34
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.50
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.26
long-run
Ann. covariance
1402.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FATE and RVP?

On 3 years of weekly data the FATE/RVP correlation comes out at 0.34, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.50) runs above the 3-year figure (0.34). The 5-year figure is 0.26, and annualized covariance runs at 1402.4 %².

By 3-year correlation, RVP places #15 of the 21 assets tracked against FATE. The last year tells two different stories: FATE led by 139.8 percentage points, +126.8% for FATE against -13.0% for RVP. Note the risk asymmetry: FATE runs 3.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FATE vs RVP: side by side

FATE (Fate Therapeutics, Inc.)RVP (Retractable Technologies, Inc.)
1-year return+126.8%-13.0%
5-year return-96.5%-94.2%
Volatility (ann.)110.8%36.9%
Beta vs S&P 5002.880.49
Max drawdown (3Y)-91.9%-57.5%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: RVP -57.5% vs -91.9%Higher 5y return: RVP -94.2% vs -96.5%
-20%0%+207%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FATE · RVP

Year-by-year returns

YearFATERVP
2022-82.8%-76.3%
2023-62.9%-32.3%
2024-55.9%-37.8%
2025-40.6%+11.6%
2026+159.2%-6.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FATE and RVP good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.34, FATE and RVP keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FATE and RVP?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.34 over 3 years, with 0.50 over the last year and 0.26 over 5 years.

Is RVP a good diversifier for FATE?

Reasonably. At 0.34, FATE and RVP keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.34 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.34 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fate-vs-rvp.json

FATE vs RVP: 3-year weekly correlation 0.34FATE vs RVP0.34

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FATE vs RVP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fate-vs-rvp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fate-vs-rvp/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FATE correlations · RVP correlations