FAF vs VXZ: Correlation
First American Corporation (New) (FAF) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.38.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FAF and VXZ?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FAF and VXZ correlate at -0.38, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.28) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.44, with an annualized covariance of -249.7 %².
VXZ is close to the least connected end of FAF's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 11. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FAF ahead by 31.8 points (+15.7% versus -16.1%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FAF vs VXZ: side by side
| FAF (First American Corporation (New)) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +15.7% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | +24.3% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 25.7% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.72 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -22.1% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $7.6B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 10.2 | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.99% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FAF | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -30.6% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | +27.7% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | +0.4% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | +1.9% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | +23.3% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FAF and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.38 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FAF and VXZ?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FAF and VXZ is -0.38 over 3 years, -0.28 over 1 year and -0.44 over 5 years.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for FAF?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.38 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.38 mean?
A reading of -0.38 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/faf-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/faf-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FAF correlations · VXZ correlations
