PairBook
HomeF › F vs STI

F vs STI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Ford Motor Company (F) and Solidion Technology, Inc. (STI) carry a correlation of -0.19, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3104.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are F and STI?

On 3 years of weekly data the F/STI correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.30 versus -0.19 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.15, and annualized covariance runs at -3104.5 %².

Among the 35 assets we track against F, STI ranks #30 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months STI outperformed by 122.8 percentage points (+22.6% for F against +145.4% for STI). One caveat on sizing: STI is 12.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

F vs STI: side by side

F (Ford Motor Company)STI (Solidion Technology, Inc.)
1-year return+22.6%+145.4%
5-year return+45.8%-98.5%
Volatility (ann.)36.1%458.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.06-1.02
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.5%-99.5%
Market cap$55.6B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield4.32%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Higher yield: F 4.32% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: F -36.5% vs -99.5%Higher 5y return: F +45.8% vs -98.5%
-35%0%+503%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). F · STI

Year-by-year returns

YearFSTI
2022-42.2%
2023+15.8%-24.1%
2024-13.1%-90.9%
2025+42.3%-79.7%
2026+10.0%+9.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are F and STI good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between F and STI?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.30 over the last year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is STI a good diversifier for F?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/f-vs-sti.json

F vs STI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19F vs STI-0.19

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![F vs STI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/f-vs-sti.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/f-vs-sti/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: F correlations · STI correlations