PairBook
HomeF › F vs NSPR

F vs NSPR: Correlation

Ford Motor Company (F) and InspireMD Inc. (NSPR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.18.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.01
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.00
long-run
Ann. covariance
-382.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are F and NSPR?

Over the past 3 years, F and NSPR moved with a correlation of -0.18, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.01) than the 3-year average (-0.18). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.00, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -382.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, NSPR places #28 of the 35 assets tracked against F. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months F outperformed by 86.2 percentage points (+22.6% for F against -63.6% for NSPR). Note the risk asymmetry: NSPR runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

F vs NSPR: side by side

F (Ford Motor Company)NSPR (InspireMD Inc.)
1-year return+22.6%-63.6%
5-year return+45.8%-80.3%
Volatility (ann.)36.1%58.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.060.05
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.5%-82.8%
Market cap$55.6B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield4.32%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Higher yield: F 4.32% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: F -36.5% vs -82.8%Higher 5y return: F +45.8% vs -80.3%
-73%0%+54%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. F · NSPR

Year-by-year returns

YearFNSPR
2022-42.2%-71.5%
2023+15.8%+226.7%
2024-13.1%-6.4%
2025+42.3%-32.3%
2026+10.0%-50.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are F and NSPR good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.18 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between F and NSPR?

The F/NSPR correlation stands at -0.18 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.01, 5 years: -0.00), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NSPR a good diversifier for F?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.18 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.18 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/f-vs-nspr.json

F vs NSPR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18F vs NSPR-0.18

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![F vs NSPR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/f-vs-nspr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/f-vs-nspr/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: F correlations · NSPR correlations