PairBook
HomeEXE › EXE vs ZOOZ

EXE vs ZOOZ: Correlation

Expand Energy (EXE) and ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.17
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-993.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EXE and ZOOZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the EXE/ZOOZ correlation comes out at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.17 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -993.2 %².

Among the 32 assets we track against EXE, ZOOZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #30. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months EXE outperformed by 84.1 percentage points (+5.2% for EXE against -78.9% for ZOOZ). Note the risk asymmetry: ZOOZ runs 5.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EXE vs ZOOZ: side by side

EXE (Expand Energy)ZOOZ (ZOOZ Strategy Ltd.)
1-year return+5.2%-78.9%
5-year return+125.8%n/a
Volatility (ann.)28.2%147.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.311.83
Max drawdown (3Y)-28.4%-93.9%
Market cap$22.7B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)8.3
Dividend yield3.30%0.00%
Sector / categoryEnergyUS Listed
Higher yield: EXE 3.30% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: EXE -28.4% vs -93.9%
-89%0%+29%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). EXE · ZOOZ

Year-by-year returns

YearEXEZOOZ
2022+62.3%
2023-14.8%
2024+33.2%
2025+14.4%-82.1%
2026-9.6%-22.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EXE and ZOOZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, EXE and ZOOZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EXE and ZOOZ?

The EXE/ZOOZ correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.17, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ZOOZ a good diversifier for EXE?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, EXE and ZOOZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/exe-vs-zooz.json

EXE vs ZOOZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24EXE vs ZOOZ-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![EXE vs ZOOZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/exe-vs-zooz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/exe-vs-zooz/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EXE correlations · ZOOZ correlations