PairBook
HomeEXE › EXE vs VET

EXE vs VET: Correlation

How closely do Expand Energy (EXE) and Vermilion Energy Inc. Common (Canada) (VET) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.56, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.56
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.61
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.59
long-run
Ann. covariance
683.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EXE and VET?

Over the past 3 years, EXE and VET moved with a correlation of 0.56, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.61 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.59, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 683.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, VET places #9 of the 32 assets tracked against EXE. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VET outperformed by 63.2 percentage points (+5.2% for EXE against +68.4% for VET). Risk is not evenly split, since VET carries 1.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EXE vs VET: side by side

EXE (Expand Energy)VET (Vermilion Energy Inc. Common (Canada))
1-year return+5.2%+68.4%
5-year return+125.8%+115.2%
Volatility (ann.)28.2%43.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.310.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-28.4%-63.4%
Market cap$22.7B$1.9B
P/E (trailing)8.3
Dividend yield3.30%4.32%
Sector / categoryEnergyUS Listed
Higher yield: VET 4.32% vs 3.30%Smaller drawdown: EXE -28.4% vs -63.4%Higher 5y return: EXE +125.8% vs +115.2%
-7%0%+92%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. EXE · VET

Year-by-year returns

YearEXEVET
2022+62.3%+42.1%
2023-14.8%-30.3%
2024+33.2%-19.4%
2025+14.4%-9.1%
2026-9.6%+55.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EXE and VET good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.56 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EXE and VET?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between EXE and VET is 0.56 over 3 years, 0.61 over 1 year and 0.59 over 5 years.

Is VET a good diversifier for EXE?

To a limited degree. At 0.56 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.56 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.56 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/exe-vs-vet.json

EXE vs VET: 3-year weekly correlation 0.56EXE vs VET0.56

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![EXE vs VET correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/exe-vs-vet.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/exe-vs-vet/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EXE correlations · VET correlations