PairBook
HomeEXE › EXE vs GJT

EXE vs GJT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Expand Energy (EXE) and Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. Floating Rate (GJT) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.05
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-46.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EXE and GJT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of EXE and GJT correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.05 versus -0.23 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.12, with an annualized covariance of -46.5 %².

Among the 32 assets we track against EXE, GJT ranks #27 by 3-year correlation. Their 12-month results are close: +5.2% for EXE against +8.6% for GJT. One caveat on sizing: EXE is 3.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EXE vs GJT: side by side

EXE (Expand Energy)GJT (Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. Floating Rate)
1-year return+5.2%+8.6%
5-year return+125.8%+44.3%
Volatility (ann.)28.2%7.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.31-0.02
Max drawdown (3Y)-28.4%-5.3%
Market cap$22.7B
P/E (trailing)8.3
Dividend yield3.30%
Sector / categoryEnergyUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GJT -5.3% vs -28.4%Higher 5y return: EXE +125.8% vs +44.3%
-7%0%+29%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. EXE · GJT

Year-by-year returns

YearEXEGJT
2022+62.3%+4.5%
2023-14.8%+13.6%
2024+33.2%+10.6%
2025+14.4%+6.2%
2026-9.6%+3.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EXE and GJT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, EXE and GJT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EXE and GJT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.23 over 3 years, with 0.05 over the last year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is GJT a good diversifier for EXE?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, EXE and GJT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/exe-vs-gjt.json

EXE vs GJT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23EXE vs GJT-0.23

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![EXE vs GJT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/exe-vs-gjt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/exe-vs-gjt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EXE correlations · GJT correlations