ETD vs RUSHB: Correlation
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.61.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ETD and RUSHB?
Over the past 3 years, ETD and RUSHB moved with a correlation of 0.61, which is strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.67 over 1 year against 0.61 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.53, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 533.5 %².
By 3-year correlation, RUSHB places #5 of the 12 assets tracked against ETD. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RUSHB outperformed by 46.9 percentage points (-15.3% for ETD against +31.6% for RUSHB).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ETD vs RUSHB: side by side
| ETD (Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.) | RUSHB (Rush Enterprises, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -15.3% | +31.6% |
| 5-year return | +35.4% | +185.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 28.2% | 30.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.66 | 0.88 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -36.8% | -28.5% |
| Market cap | $0.6B | $9.0B |
| P/E (trailing) | 15.1 | 23.1 |
| Dividend yield | 6.61% | 0.99% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ETD | RUSHB |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +7.5% | +5.9% |
| 2023 | +28.7% | +43.4% |
| 2024 | -6.0% | +4.3% |
| 2025 | -13.2% | +4.8% |
| 2026 | +9.3% | +38.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ETD and RUSHB good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.61 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ETD and RUSHB?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ETD and RUSHB is 0.61 over 3 years, 0.67 over 1 year and 0.53 over 5 years.
Is RUSHB a good diversifier for ETD?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.61 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.61 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.61 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/etd-vs-rushb.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/etd-vs-rushb/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ETD correlations · RUSHB correlations
