PairBook
HomeESLA › ESLA vs WM

ESLA vs WM: Correlation

Estrella Immunopharma, Inc. (ESLA) and Waste Management (WM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-517.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ESLA and WM?

Over the past 3 years, ESLA and WM moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.12) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.24). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.15, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -517.3 %².

WM is close to the least connected end of ESLA's tracked universe, ranking #10 of 10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WM ahead by 21.2 points (-23.2% versus -2.0%). One caveat on sizing: ESLA is 6.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ESLA vs WM: side by side

ESLA (Estrella Immunopharma, Inc.)WM (Waste Management)
1-year return-23.2%-2.0%
5-year return-92.6%+51.8%
Volatility (ann.)120.6%18.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.200.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.7%-18.1%
Market cap$87.0B
P/E (trailing)30.8
Dividend yield0.00%1.60%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: WM 1.60% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WM -18.1% vs -96.7%Higher 5y return: WM +51.8% vs -92.6%
-32%0%+179%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ESLA · WM

Year-by-year returns

YearESLAWM
2022+3.8%-4.5%
2023-89.2%+16.2%
2024+8.1%+14.3%
2025+30.0%+10.5%
2026-53.7%-0.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ESLA and WM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ESLA and WM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ESLA and WM is -0.24 over 3 years, -0.12 over 1 year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is WM a good diversifier for ESLA?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/esla-vs-wm.json

ESLA vs WM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24ESLA vs WM-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ESLA vs WM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/esla-vs-wm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/esla-vs-wm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ESLA correlations · WM correlations