PairBook
HomeERO › ERO vs VXZ

ERO vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Ero Copper Corp. (ERO) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.31, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.31
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.29
long-run
Ann. covariance
-435.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ERO and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, ERO and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.31, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.39) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.29, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -435.4 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of ERO's tracked universe, ranking #8 of 10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ERO ahead by 190.5 points (+174.4% versus -16.1%). One caveat on sizing: ERO is 2.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ERO vs VXZ: side by side

ERO (Ero Copper Corp.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+174.4%-16.1%
5-year return+110.6%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)54.7%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.53-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-59.7%-36.4%
Market cap$4.2B
P/E (trailing)13.3
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -59.7%Higher 5y return: ERO +110.6% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+166%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ERO · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearEROVXZ
2022-10.1%+0.5%
2023+14.8%-44.0%
2024-14.6%-12.7%
2025+109.9%+5.7%
2026+40.8%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ERO and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.31, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ERO and VXZ?

The ERO/VXZ correlation stands at -0.31 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.39, 5 years: -0.29), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for ERO?

Yes: at -0.31, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ero-vs-vxz.json

ERO vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.31ERO vs VXZ-0.31

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ERO vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ero-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ero-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ERO correlations · VXZ correlations