PairBook
HomeEQNR › EQNR vs IWM

EQNR vs IWM: Correlation

How closely do Equinor ASA (EQNR) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.13, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.13
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.50
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-87.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EQNR and IWM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of EQNR and IWM correlate at -0.13, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.50) than the 3-year average (-0.13). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.06, with an annualized covariance of -87.0 %².

Within EQNR's tracked universe of 79 assets, IWM comes in at #13 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with EQNR ahead by 48.8 points (+77.2% versus +28.4%). Note the risk asymmetry: EQNR runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EQNR vs IWM: side by side

EQNR (Equinor ASA)IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF)
1-year return+77.2%+28.4%
5-year return+180.6%+41.5%
Volatility (ann.)33.2%19.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.251.06
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.6%-27.5%
Market cap$98.6B
P/E (trailing)11.2
Dividend yield3.73%0.91%
Expense ratio0.19%
Assets under management$80.1B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · US Small & Mid Cap
Higher yield: EQNR 3.73% vs 0.91%Smaller drawdown: IWM -27.5% vs -27.6%Higher 5y return: EQNR +180.6% vs +41.5%

IWM, iShares's Small Blend fund, carries $80.1B under management, 1757 holdings, a 0.19% expense ratio, a 0.91% trailing dividend yield.

-3%0%+89%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. EQNR · IWM

Year-by-year returns

YearEQNRIWM
2022+42.8%-20.5%
2023-0.8%+16.8%
2024-16.0%+11.4%
2025+6.1%+12.7%
2026+81.8%+22.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EQNR and IWM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.13, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EQNR and IWM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between EQNR and IWM is -0.13 over 3 years, -0.50 over 1 year and 0.06 over 5 years.

Is IWM a good diversifier for EQNR?

Yes: at -0.13, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.13 mean?

A reading of -0.13 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eqnr-vs-iwm.json

EQNR vs IWM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.13EQNR vs IWM-0.13

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![EQNR vs IWM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/eqnr-vs-iwm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eqnr-vs-iwm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EQNR correlations · IWM correlations