PairBook
HomeEQ › EQ vs FRAF

EQ vs FRAF: Correlation

Equillium, Inc. (EQ) and Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.11
long-run
Ann. covariance
-983.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EQ and FRAF?

Over the past 3 years, EQ and FRAF moved with a correlation of -0.21, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.22 over 1 year against -0.21 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.11, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -983.6 %².

FRAF is close to the least connected end of EQ's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 13. Over the last 12 months FRAF came out ahead by 8.5 percentage points (+28.3% against +36.8%). Note the risk asymmetry: EQ runs 4.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EQ vs FRAF: side by side

EQ (Equillium, Inc.)FRAF (Franklin Financial Services Corporation)
1-year return+28.3%+36.8%
5-year return-60.0%+133.8%
Volatility (ann.)147.8%31.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.030.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-90.3%-25.5%
Market cap$0.2B$0.3B
P/E (trailing)11.3
Dividend yield0.00%2.14%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: FRAF 2.14% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FRAF -25.5% vs -90.3%Higher 5y return: FRAF +133.8% vs -60.0%
-56%0%+60%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. EQ · FRAF

Year-by-year returns

YearEQFRAF
2022-71.9%+13.5%
2023-32.1%-8.8%
2024+4.2%-1.4%
2025+106.7%+73.5%
2026+58.1%+25.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EQ and FRAF good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EQ and FRAF?

The EQ/FRAF correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.22, 5 years: -0.11), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is FRAF a good diversifier for EQ?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eq-vs-fraf.json

EQ vs FRAF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21EQ vs FRAF-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![EQ vs FRAF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/eq-vs-fraf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eq-vs-fraf/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EQ correlations · FRAF correlations