EPOW vs LAC: Correlation
E-Power Inc. - Class A (EPOW) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.32.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are EPOW and LAC?
Over the past 3 years, EPOW and LAC moved with a correlation of 0.32, which is moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.50) runs above the 3-year figure (0.32). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 2299.6 %².
Few assets follow EPOW as closely as LAC, which ranks #3 of 10 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: LAC led by 56.3 percentage points, -49.9% for EPOW against +6.4% for LAC.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
EPOW vs LAC: side by side
| EPOW (E-Power Inc. - Class A) | LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -49.9% | +6.4% |
| 5-year return | -81.9% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.1% | 93.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.06 | 1.37 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -80.3% | -81.8% |
| Market cap | – | $1.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | EPOW | LAC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +135.3% | – |
| 2023 | -60.4% | – |
| 2024 | -20.0% | -53.6% |
| 2025 | +13.4% | +46.8% |
| 2026 | -54.3% | -27.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are EPOW and LAC good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.32 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between EPOW and LAC?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.32 over 3 years, with 0.50 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is LAC a good diversifier for EPOW?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.32 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.32 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.32 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/epow-vs-lac.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/epow-vs-lac/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: EPOW correlations · LAC correlations