PairBook
HomeENTA › ENTA vs HQL

ENTA vs HQL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA) and abrdn Life Sciences Investors Shares of Beneficial Interest (HQL) carry a correlation of 0.52, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.52
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.54
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.48
long-run
Ann. covariance
868.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ENTA and HQL?

On 3 years of weekly data the ENTA/HQL correlation comes out at 0.52, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.54 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.48, and annualized covariance runs at 868.8 %².

In ENTA's tracked universe of 15 assets, HQL sits right near the top at #3. Over the last 12 months HQL came out ahead by 14.1 percentage points (+61.8% against +75.9%). One caveat on sizing: ENTA is 3.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ENTA vs HQL: side by side

ENTA (Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)HQL (abrdn Life Sciences Investors Shares of Beneficial Interest)
1-year return+61.8%+75.9%
5-year return-75.7%+74.1%
Volatility (ann.)70.9%23.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.570.88
Max drawdown (3Y)-75.6%-25.1%
Market cap$0.4B
P/E (trailing)3.2
Dividend yield0.00%8.87%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: HQL 8.87% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HQL -25.1% vs -75.6%Higher 5y return: HQL +74.1% vs -75.7%
-14%0%+90%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ENTA · HQL

Year-by-year returns

YearENTAHQL
2022-37.8%-19.2%
2023-79.8%+4.2%
2024-38.9%+11.0%
2025+174.3%+45.5%
2026-12.5%+40.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ENTA and HQL good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.52 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ENTA and HQL?

The ENTA/HQL correlation stands at 0.52 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.54, 5 years: 0.48), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is HQL a good diversifier for ENTA?

To a limited degree. At 0.52 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.52 mean?

A reading of 0.52 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/enta-vs-hql.json

ENTA vs HQL: 3-year weekly correlation 0.52ENTA vs HQL0.52

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ENTA vs HQL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/enta-vs-hql.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/enta-vs-hql/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ENTA correlations · HQL correlations