ENLV vs SFWL: Correlation
Enlivex Ltd. (ENLV) and Shengfeng Development Limited - Class A (SFWL) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.28.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ENLV and SFWL?
On 3 years of weekly data the ENLV/SFWL correlation comes out at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.28) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -2901.0 %².
SFWL is close to the least connected end of ENLV's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 13. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SFWL ahead by 76.6 points (-91.0% versus -14.4%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ENLV vs SFWL: side by side
| ENLV (Enlivex Ltd.) | SFWL (Shengfeng Development Limited - Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -91.0% | -14.4% |
| 5-year return | -99.2% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 111.4% | 94.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.02 | 0.08 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.7% | -95.9% |
| Market cap | – | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 0.0 | 6.2 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ENLV | SFWL |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -37.0% | – |
| 2023 | -31.4% | – |
| 2024 | -56.7% | -63.3% |
| 2025 | -39.9% | -12.0% |
| 2026 | -86.0% | -8.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ENLV and SFWL good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ENLV and SFWL?
The ENLV/SFWL correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.28, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is SFWL a good diversifier for ENLV?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?
A reading of -0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/enlv-vs-sfwl.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/enlv-vs-sfwl/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ENLV correlations · SFWL correlations