PairBook
HomeEMR › EMR vs EQS

EMR vs EQS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Emerson Electric (EMR) and Equus Total Return, Inc. (EQS) carry a correlation of -0.12, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.12
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-163.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EMR and EQS?

Over the past 3 years, EMR and EQS moved with a correlation of -0.12, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.29) than the 3-year average (-0.12). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.07, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -163.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, EQS places #38 of the 47 assets tracked against EMR. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with EMR ahead by 69.5 points (+20.0% versus -49.5%). One caveat on sizing: EQS is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EMR vs EQS: side by side

EMR (Emerson Electric)EQS (Equus Total Return, Inc.)
1-year return+20.0%-49.5%
5-year return+65.4%-58.6%
Volatility (ann.)28.3%47.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.29-0.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.6%-58.6%
Market cap$88.0B
P/E (trailing)34.5
Dividend yield1.39%0.00%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Higher yield: EMR 1.39% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: EMR -29.6% vs -58.6%Higher 5y return: EMR +65.4% vs -58.6%
-54%0%+25%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. EMR · EQS

Year-by-year returns

YearEMREQS
2022+5.7%-39.9%
2023+3.8%+1.4%
2024+29.7%-24.1%
2025+8.9%+28.2%
2026+20.2%-27.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EMR and EQS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.12, EMR and EQS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EMR and EQS?

The EMR/EQS correlation stands at -0.12 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.29, 5 years: -0.07), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is EQS a good diversifier for EMR?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.12, EMR and EQS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.12 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/emr-vs-eqs.json

EMR vs EQS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.12EMR vs EQS-0.12

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![EMR vs EQS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/emr-vs-eqs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/emr-vs-eqs/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EMR correlations · EQS correlations