PairBook
HomeEMF › EMF vs VLN

EMF vs VLN: Correlation

How closely do Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) and Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.46, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.46
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.57
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.40
long-run
Ann. covariance
755.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EMF and VLN?

Over the past 3 years, EMF and VLN moved with a correlation of 0.46, which is moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.57 versus 0.46 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.40, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 755.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, VLN places #15 of the 21 assets tracked against EMF. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months EMF outperformed by 69.0 percentage points (+61.6% for EMF against -7.4% for VLN). Risk is not evenly split, since VLN carries 3.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EMF vs VLN: side by side

EMF (Templeton Emerging Markets Fund)VLN (Valens Semiconductor Ltd.)
1-year return+61.6%-7.4%
5-year return+91.4%-74.7%
Volatility (ann.)21.0%79.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.932.08
Max drawdown (3Y)-19.5%-67.9%
Market cap$0.3B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)2.4
Dividend yield3.91%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: EMF 3.91% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: EMF -19.5% vs -67.9%Higher 5y return: EMF +91.4% vs -74.7%
-41%0%+77%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. EMF · VLN

Year-by-year returns

YearEMFVLN
2022-21.5%-30.3%
2023+8.8%-54.4%
2024+6.6%+6.1%
2025+58.2%-45.4%
2026+36.1%+31.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EMF and VLN good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.46 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EMF and VLN?

The EMF/VLN correlation stands at 0.46 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.57, 5 years: 0.40), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VLN a good diversifier for EMF?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.46 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.46 mean?

A reading of 0.46 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/emf-vs-vln.json

EMF vs VLN: 3-year weekly correlation 0.46EMF vs VLN0.46

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![EMF vs VLN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/emf-vs-vln.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/emf-vs-vln/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EMF correlations · VLN correlations