PairBook
HomeEME › EME vs LMB

EME vs LMB: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Emcor (EME) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) carry a correlation of 0.50, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.50
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.27
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.40
long-run
Ann. covariance
1066.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EME and LMB?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of EME and LMB correlate at 0.50, moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.27 versus 0.50 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.40, with an annualized covariance of 1066.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, LMB places #21 of the 34 assets tracked against EME. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with EME ahead by 91.4 points (+24.5% versus -66.9%). One caveat on sizing: LMB is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EME vs LMB: side by side

EME (Emcor)LMB (Limbach Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+24.5%-66.9%
5-year return+540.3%+417.7%
Volatility (ann.)34.9%60.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.311.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.2%-72.1%
Market cap$34.2B$0.5B
P/E (trailing)23.816.6
Dividend yield0.09%0.00%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: LMB 16.6 vs 23.8Higher yield: EME 0.09% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: EME -36.2% vs -72.1%Higher 5y return: EME +540.3% vs +417.7%
-61%0%+48%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). EME · LMB

Year-by-year returns

YearEMELMB
2022+16.8%+15.7%
2023+46.0%+336.8%
2024+111.3%+88.1%
2025+35.1%-9.0%
2026+26.9%-46.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EME and LMB good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.50 means EME and LMB share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EME and LMB?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between EME and LMB is 0.50 over 3 years, 0.27 over 1 year and 0.40 over 5 years.

Is LMB a good diversifier for EME?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.50 means EME and LMB share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.50 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.50 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eme-vs-lmb.json

EME vs LMB: 3-year weekly correlation 0.50EME vs LMB0.50

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![EME vs LMB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/eme-vs-lmb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eme-vs-lmb/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EME correlations · LMB correlations