PairBook
HomeEMD › EMD vs FAX

EMD vs FAX: Correlation

Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Inc (EMD) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund, Inc. (FAX) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.70.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.70
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.72
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.62
long-run
Ann. covariance
139.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EMD and FAX?

On 3 years of weekly data the EMD/FAX correlation comes out at 0.70, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.72 over 1 year against 0.70 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.62, and annualized covariance runs at 139.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, FAX places #8 of the 15 assets tracked against EMD. On 12-month performance EMD holds a 12.7-point edge, +15.0% against +2.3%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EMD vs FAX: side by side

EMD (Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Inc)FAX (abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund, Inc.)
1-year return+15.0%+2.3%
5-year return+28.3%+5.2%
Volatility (ann.)14.1%14.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.510.40
Max drawdown (3Y)-13.3%-13.2%
Market cap$0.6B
P/E (trailing)6.714.4
Dividend yield0.00%13.58%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: EMD 6.7 vs 14.4Higher yield: FAX 13.58% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FAX -13.2% vs -13.3%Higher 5y return: EMD +28.3% vs +5.2%
-6%0%+13%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). EMD · FAX

Year-by-year returns

YearEMDFAX
2022-20.8%-22.7%
2023+12.3%+16.8%
2024+16.3%+2.5%
2025+23.4%+18.2%
2026+6.9%+3.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EMD and FAX good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.70 means EMD and FAX share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EMD and FAX?

The EMD/FAX correlation stands at 0.70 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.72, 5 years: 0.62), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is FAX a good diversifier for EMD?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.70 means EMD and FAX share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.70 mean?

A reading of 0.70 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/emd-vs-fax.json

EMD vs FAX: 3-year weekly correlation 0.70EMD vs FAX0.70

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![EMD vs FAX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/emd-vs-fax.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/emd-vs-fax/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EMD correlations · FAX correlations