PairBook
HomeEMBC › EMBC vs FTNT

EMBC vs FTNT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Embecta Corp. (EMBC) and Fortinet (FTNT) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.61
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-811.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EMBC and FTNT?

Over the past 3 years, EMBC and FTNT moved with a correlation of -0.27, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.61) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.27). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.15, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -811.9 %².

Among the 15 assets we track against EMBC, FTNT sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FTNT ahead by 185.6 points (-64.5% versus +121.1%). Risk is not evenly split, since EMBC carries 1.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EMBC vs FTNT: side by side

EMBC (Embecta Corp.)FTNT (Fortinet)
1-year return-64.5%+121.1%
5-year return-87.8%+170.5%
Volatility (ann.)72.4%42.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.911.02
Max drawdown (3Y)-85.3%-35.1%
Market cap$0.3B$126.8B
P/E (trailing)3.460.8
Dividend yield9.29%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedInformation Technology
Lower P/E: EMBC 3.4 vs 60.8Higher yield: EMBC 9.29% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FTNT -35.1% vs -85.3%Higher 5y return: FTNT +170.5% vs -87.8%
-79%0%+119%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. EMBC · FTNT

Year-by-year returns

YearEMBCFTNT
2022-32.0%
2023-23.1%+19.7%
2024+13.6%+61.4%
2025-39.6%-16.0%
2026-57.4%+117.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EMBC and FTNT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.27, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EMBC and FTNT?

The EMBC/FTNT correlation stands at -0.27 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.61, 5 years: -0.15), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is FTNT a good diversifier for EMBC?

Yes: at -0.27, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/embc-vs-ftnt.json

EMBC vs FTNT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27EMBC vs FTNT-0.27

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![EMBC vs FTNT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/embc-vs-ftnt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/embc-vs-ftnt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EMBC correlations · FTNT correlations