PairBook
HomeELPW › ELPW vs MNST

ELPW vs MNST: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Elong Power Holding Limited - Class A (ELPW) and Monster Beverage (MNST) carry a correlation of -0.58, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.58
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.62
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-131661.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ELPW and MNST?

Over the past 3 years, ELPW and MNST moved with a correlation of -0.58, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.62) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -131661.6 %².

Out of 30 assets tracked against ELPW, MNST lands near the bottom at #30. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MNST ahead by 74.7 points (-99.0% versus -24.3%). Risk is not evenly split, since ELPW carries 48.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ELPW vs MNST: side by side

ELPW (Elong Power Holding Limited - Class A)MNST (Monster Beverage)
1-year return-99.0%-24.3%
5-year returnn/a-4.5%
Volatility (ann.)3332.8%68.6%
Beta vs S&P 5003.980.80
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-54.5%
Market cap$91.5B
P/E (trailing)43.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Smaller drawdown: MNST -54.5% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+190%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ELPW · MNST

Year-by-year returns

YearELPWMNST
2022+5.7%
2023+13.5%
2024-87.5%-8.8%
2025-91.4%+45.9%
2026-97.4%-39.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ELPW and MNST good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.58, ELPW and MNST have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ELPW and MNST?

The ELPW/MNST correlation stands at -0.58 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.62, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MNST a good diversifier for ELPW?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.58, ELPW and MNST have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.58 mean?

A reading of -0.58 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/elpw-vs-mnst.json

ELPW vs MNST: 3-year weekly correlation -0.58ELPW vs MNST-0.58

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ELPW vs MNST correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/elpw-vs-mnst.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/elpw-vs-mnst/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ELPW correlations · MNST correlations