PairBook
HomeELA › ELA vs WM

ELA vs WM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Envela Corporation (ELA) and Waste Management (WM) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-253.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ELA and WM?

On 3 years of weekly data the ELA/WM correlation comes out at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.37 versus -0.25 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.10, and annualized covariance runs at -253.6 %².

Among the 12 assets we track against ELA, WM sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #12. The last year tells two different stories: ELA led by 91.5 percentage points, +89.5% for ELA against -2.0% for WM. Note the risk asymmetry: ELA runs 3.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ELA vs WM: side by side

ELA (Envela Corporation)WM (Waste Management)
1-year return+89.5%-2.0%
5-year return+229.3%+51.8%
Volatility (ann.)56.3%18.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.610.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-51.8%-18.1%
Market cap$0.4B$87.0B
P/E (trailing)16.630.8
Dividend yield0.00%1.60%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Lower P/E: ELA 16.6 vs 30.8Higher yield: WM 1.60% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WM -18.1% vs -51.8%Higher 5y return: ELA +229.3% vs +51.8%
-9%0%+271%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ELA · WM

Year-by-year returns

YearELAWM
2022+29.2%-4.5%
2023-7.6%+16.2%
2024+47.7%+14.3%
2025+86.4%+10.5%
2026+4.1%-0.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ELA and WM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ELA and WM?

The ELA/WM correlation stands at -0.25 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.37, 5 years: -0.10), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is WM a good diversifier for ELA?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ela-vs-wm.json

ELA vs WM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25ELA vs WM-0.25

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ELA vs WM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ela-vs-wm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ela-vs-wm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ELA correlations · WM correlations