PairBook
HomeEL › EL vs QNTM

EL vs QNTM: Correlation

Estée Lauder Companies (The) (EL) and Quantum Biopharma Ltd. - Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (QNTM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2570.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EL and QNTM?

On 3 years of weekly data the EL/QNTM correlation comes out at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.18) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.18, and annualized covariance runs at -2570.3 %².

Out of 35 assets tracked against EL, QNTM lands near the bottom at #31. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with EL ahead by 97.7 points (+16.4% versus -81.3%). Note the risk asymmetry: QNTM runs 4.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EL vs QNTM: side by side

EL (Estée Lauder Companies (The))QNTM (Quantum Biopharma Ltd. - Class B Subordinate Voting Shares)
1-year return+16.4%-81.3%
5-year return-66.7%-97.4%
Volatility (ann.)47.0%230.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.280.93
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.4%-98.0%
Market cap$38.4B
P/E (trailing)208.3
Dividend yield1.33%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Higher yield: EL 1.33% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: EL -68.4% vs -98.0%Higher 5y return: EL -66.7% vs -97.4%
-84%0%+34%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). EL · QNTM

Year-by-year returns

YearELQNTM
2022-32.3%-22.7%
2023-40.1%+16.8%
2024-47.6%-93.8%
2025+42.1%+98.4%
2026+2.1%-57.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EL and QNTM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, EL and QNTM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EL and QNTM?

The EL/QNTM correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.18, 5 years: -0.18), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is QNTM a good diversifier for EL?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, EL and QNTM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/el-vs-qntm.json

EL vs QNTM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24EL vs QNTM-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![EL vs QNTM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/el-vs-qntm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/el-vs-qntm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EL correlations · QNTM correlations