EG vs INTS: Correlation
Everest Group (EG) and Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. (INTS) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are EG and INTS?
Over the past 3 years, EG and INTS moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.49 versus -0.25 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -977.2 %².
Out of 30 assets tracked against EG, INTS lands near the bottom at #29. The last year tells two different stories: EG led by 54.7 percentage points, +11.3% for EG against -43.4% for INTS. Note the risk asymmetry: INTS runs 7.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
EG vs INTS: side by side
| EG (Everest Group) | INTS (Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +11.3% | -43.4% |
| 5-year return | +57.2% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 22.2% | 173.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.28 | 0.52 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -23.8% | -98.5% |
| Market cap | $14.5B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 8.0 | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.11% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Financials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | EG | INTS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +23.7% | – |
| 2023 | +8.7% | – |
| 2024 | +4.6% | -79.5% |
| 2025 | -5.3% | -76.7% |
| 2026 | +12.7% | -58.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are EG and INTS good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, EG and INTS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between EG and INTS?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.25 over 3 years, with -0.49 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is INTS a good diversifier for EG?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, EG and INTS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eg-vs-ints.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eg-vs-ints/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: EG correlations · INTS correlations
