PairBook
HomeEFT › EFT vs VXZ

EFT vs VXZ: Correlation

Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income Trust (EFT) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.54.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.54
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.48
long-run
Ann. covariance
-151.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EFT and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the EFT/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.54, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.47 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.48, and annualized covariance runs at -151.0 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of EFT's tracked universe, ranking #14 of 14. On 12-month performance EFT holds a 11.3-point edge, -4.8% against -16.1%. Note the risk asymmetry: VXZ runs 2.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EFT vs VXZ: side by side

EFT (Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income Trust)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-4.8%-16.1%
5-year return+13.9%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)10.9%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.49-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.5%-36.4%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)42.4
Dividend yield9.41%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: EFT -17.5% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: EFT +13.9% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. EFT · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearEFTVXZ
2022-19.7%+0.5%
2023+27.1%-44.0%
2024+13.2%-12.7%
2025-3.8%+5.7%
2026-1.6%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EFT and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.54, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EFT and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.54 over 3 years, with -0.47 over the last year and -0.48 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for EFT?

Yes: at -0.54, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.54 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.54 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eft-vs-vxz.json

EFT vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.54EFT vs VXZ-0.54

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![EFT vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/eft-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eft-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EFT correlations · VXZ correlations