EFOR vs TORO: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) and Toro Corp. (TORO) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are EFOR and TORO?
On 3 years of weekly data the EFOR/TORO correlation comes out at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.42 versus -0.25 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -1073.0 %².
TORO is close to the least connected end of EFOR's tracked universe, ranking #8 of 12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with TORO ahead by 317.0 points (-40.7% versus +276.3%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
EFOR vs TORO: side by side
| EFOR (Everforth, Inc.) | TORO (Toro Corp.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -40.7% | +276.3% |
| 5-year return | -71.9% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 54.8% | 78.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.83 | 0.97 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -83.7% | -71.5% |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $0.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | 16.2 | 311.5 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | EFOR | TORO |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -34.0% | – |
| 2023 | +18.0% | – |
| 2024 | -13.3% | -42.9% |
| 2025 | -42.2% | +87.9% |
| 2026 | -34.3% | +96.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are EFOR and TORO good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between EFOR and TORO?
The EFOR/TORO correlation stands at -0.25 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.42, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is TORO a good diversifier for EFOR?
Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/efor-vs-toro.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/efor-vs-toro/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: EFOR correlations · TORO correlations
