PairBook
HomeEFA › EFA vs TM

EFA vs TM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) carry a correlation of 0.58, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.58
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.59
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.59
long-run
Ann. covariance
251.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EFA and TM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of EFA and TM correlate at 0.58, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.59) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.59, with an annualized covariance of 251.7 %².

Within EFA's tracked universe of 109 assets, TM comes in at #69 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with EFA ahead by 24.3 points (+21.9% versus -2.4%). Risk is not evenly split, since TM carries 1.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EFA vs TM: side by side

EFA (iShares MSCI EAFE ETF)TM (Toyota Motor Corporation)
1-year return+21.9%-2.4%
5-year return+56.7%+24.1%
Volatility (ann.)14.9%28.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.770.83
Max drawdown (3Y)-14.1%-34.9%
Market cap$227.4B
P/E (trailing)8.7
Dividend yield3.19%49.52%
Expense ratio0.32%
Assets under management$78.0B
Sector / categoryETF · InternationalUS Listed
Higher yield: TM 49.52% vs 3.19%Smaller drawdown: EFA -14.1% vs -34.9%Higher 5y return: EFA +56.7% vs +24.1%

On the fund side, EFA sits in the Foreign Large Blend category at iShares, with $78.0B under management, 666 holdings, a 0.32% expense ratio, a 3.19% trailing dividend yield.

-14%0%+24%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. EFA · TM

Year-by-year returns

YearEFATM
2022-14.4%-24.4%
2023+18.4%+38.2%
2024+3.5%+8.9%
2025+31.5%+12.2%
2026+14.3%-10.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EFA and TM good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.58 means EFA and TM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EFA and TM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between EFA and TM is 0.58 over 3 years, 0.59 over 1 year and 0.59 over 5 years.

Is TM a good diversifier for EFA?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.58 means EFA and TM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.58 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.58 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/efa-vs-tm.json

EFA vs TM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.58EFA vs TM0.58

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![EFA vs TM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/efa-vs-tm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/efa-vs-tm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EFA correlations · TM correlations