PairBook
HomeEDTK › EDTK vs MET

EDTK vs MET: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) and MetLife (MET) carry a correlation of -0.16, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-168.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EDTK and MET?

On 3 years of weekly data the EDTK/MET correlation comes out at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.12) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.15, and annualized covariance runs at -168.7 %².

By 3-year correlation, MET places #9 of the 16 assets tracked against EDTK. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MET outperformed by 40.3 percentage points (-18.2% for EDTK against +22.1% for MET). Risk is not evenly split, since EDTK carries 1.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EDTK vs MET: side by side

EDTK (Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited)MET (MetLife)
1-year return-18.2%+22.1%
5-year return-41.9%+80.8%
Volatility (ann.)45.4%23.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.090.89
Max drawdown (3Y)-35.4%-22.0%
Market cap$61.2B
P/E (trailing)18.5
Dividend yield0.00%2.38%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: MET 2.38% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MET -22.0% vs -35.4%Higher 5y return: MET +80.8% vs -41.9%
-17%0%+26%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. EDTK · MET

Year-by-year returns

YearEDTKMET
2022+52.4%+19.2%
2023-12.5%-5.5%
2024-19.8%+27.7%
2025-10.9%-0.8%
2026+0.0%+24.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EDTK and MET good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.16 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EDTK and MET?

The EDTK/MET correlation stands at -0.16 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.12, 5 years: -0.15), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MET a good diversifier for EDTK?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.16 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.16 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/edtk-vs-met.json

EDTK vs MET: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16EDTK vs MET-0.16

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![EDTK vs MET correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/edtk-vs-met.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/edtk-vs-met/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EDTK correlations · MET correlations