PairBook
HomeED › ED vs RDDT

ED vs RDDT: Correlation

How closely do Consolidated Edison (ED) and Reddit (RDDT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.24, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-301.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ED and RDDT?

Over the past 3 years, ED and RDDT moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.24 over 1 year against -0.24 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -301.2 %².

Within ED's tracked universe of 105 assets, RDDT comes in at #72 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ED ahead by 37.3 points (+10.2% versus -27.1%). The rolling one-year correlation stayed in a tight band between -0.35 and -0.21 over the past three years, which points to a structural rather than episodic relationship. Risk is not evenly split, since RDDT carries 4.6 times the volatility of the other side.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ED vs RDDT: side by side

ED (Consolidated Edison)RDDT (Reddit)
1-year return+10.2%-27.1%
5-year return+67.5%n/a
Volatility (ann.)16.5%75.2%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.212.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.4%-61.4%
Market cap$39.5B$29.6B
P/E (trailing)17.536.1
Dividend yield3.22%0.00%
Sector / categoryUtilitiesCommunication Services
Lower P/E: ED 17.5 vs 36.1Higher yield: ED 3.22% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ED -17.4% vs -61.4%
-49%0%+20%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ED · RDDT

Year-by-year returns

YearEDRDDT
2022+15.7%
2023-1.1%
2024+1.5%
2025+15.1%+40.6%
2026+10.1%-33.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ED and RDDT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, ED and RDDT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ED and RDDT?

The ED/RDDT correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.24, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RDDT a good diversifier for ED?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, ED and RDDT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ed-vs-rddt.json

ED vs RDDT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24ED vs RDDT-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ED vs RDDT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ed-vs-rddt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ed-vs-rddt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ED correlations · RDDT correlations