PairBook
HomeED › ED vs ON

ED vs ON: Correlation

Consolidated Edison (ED) and ON Semiconductor (ON) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-163.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ED and ON?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ED and ON correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.28) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.07, with an annualized covariance of -163.6 %².

Among the 105 assets we track against ED, ON ranks #49 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ON outperformed by 35.8 percentage points (+10.2% for ED against +46.0% for ON). Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from -0.39 to 0.09. One caveat on sizing: ON is 3.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ED vs ON: side by side

ED (Consolidated Edison)ON (ON Semiconductor)
1-year return+10.2%+46.0%
5-year return+67.5%+65.2%
Volatility (ann.)16.5%49.2%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.211.61
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.4%-67.9%
Market cap$39.5B$29.1B
P/E (trailing)17.547.9
Dividend yield3.22%0.00%
Sector / categoryUtilitiesInformation Technology
Lower P/E: ED 17.5 vs 47.9Higher yield: ED 3.22% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ED -17.4% vs -67.9%Higher 5y return: ED +67.5% vs +65.2%
-7%0%+148%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ED · ON

Year-by-year returns

YearEDON
2022+15.7%-8.2%
2023-1.1%+33.9%
2024+1.5%-24.5%
2025+15.1%-14.1%
2026+10.1%+38.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ED and ON good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ED and ON?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ED and ON is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.28 over 1 year and -0.07 over 5 years.

Is ON a good diversifier for ED?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ed-vs-on.json

ED vs ON: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20ED vs ON-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ED vs ON correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ed-vs-on.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ed-vs-on/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ED correlations · ON correlations