PairBook
HomeED › ED vs MSFT

ED vs MSFT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Consolidated Edison (ED) and Microsoft (MSFT) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-123.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ED and MSFT?

On 3 years of weekly data the ED/MSFT correlation comes out at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.31) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.04, and annualized covariance runs at -123.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, MSFT places #86 of the 105 assets tracked against ED. The trailing year gives ED the advantage: +10.2% versus +0.5%, a 9.7-point spread. Do not treat this figure as fixed: across three years the rolling one-year correlation ranged all the way from -0.39 to 0.20. Note the risk asymmetry: MSFT runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ED vs MSFT: side by side

ED (Consolidated Edison)MSFT (Microsoft)
1-year return+10.2%+0.5%
5-year return+67.5%+73.3%
Volatility (ann.)16.5%27.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.211.12
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.4%-34.5%
Market cap$39.5B$3,750.3B
P/E (trailing)17.528.1
Dividend yield3.22%0.73%
Sector / categoryUtilitiesInformation Technology
Lower P/E: ED 17.5 vs 28.1Higher yield: ED 3.22% vs 0.73%Smaller drawdown: ED -17.4% vs -34.5%Higher 5y return: MSFT +73.3% vs +67.5%
-28%0%+20%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ED · MSFT

Year-by-year returns

YearEDMSFT
2022+15.7%-28.0%
2023-1.1%+58.2%
2024+1.5%+12.9%
2025+15.1%+15.6%
2026+10.1%+5.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ED and MSFT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ED and MSFT?

The ED/MSFT correlation stands at -0.27 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.31, 5 years: -0.04), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MSFT a good diversifier for ED?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.27 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ed-vs-msft.json

ED vs MSFT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27ED vs MSFT-0.27

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ED vs MSFT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ed-vs-msft.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ed-vs-msft/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ED correlations · MSFT correlations